-
Website
http://blogs.nashuatelegraph.com/webnotes -
Original page
http://blogs.nashuatelegraph.com/webnotes/2006/09/09/a-response-to-the-web-poll-hacking/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
Kook's of a feather
As in the movie Scarface. "The eye's don't lie Cheeko". The exenterated Texan enunciation reminds me of fingernails down a chalkboard. It doesn't surprise me that the enthusiastically written response by Dr. Earl's son is why the Internet is an unprincipled place. Sorry, Brother (son) of educator whoever. The act is just about over. No respect going forward! Baggage heavy one might say.
Kook's of a feather
As in the movie Scarface. "The eye's don't lie Cheeko". The exenterated Texan enunciation reminds me of fingernails down a chalkboard. It doesn't surprise me that the enthusiastically written response by Dr. Earl's son is why the Internet is an unprincipled place. Sorry, Brother (son) of educator whoever. The act is just about over. No respect going forward! Baggage heavy one might say.
Kudos to J. Ryan Earl, beloved son of Julia Earl!!! It is about time someone called the Telegraph on their effort to trash Dr. Earl. This is has been a ridiculous media blistering the likes of which we have never seen.
Now if someone would challenge the School Baord on the action they took! How can they, in good conscience, fail to back the one person who had the courage and skills to stand up during the budget process. How can they walk out on the woman they supported so strongly until she looked to go to another place that might appreciate her? Then they deserted her for their own political futures.
While the newspaper, the mayor, and others have tried to "stone her" (as was suggested in an earlier blog comment ), the Board has now clubbed her and has left her. What a hasty decision.
All of this over a little more than $3000---couldn't you have found another way to resolve this issue? Hardly enough money to destroy a person over.
Shame on you, Board members. Shame on you. You have one last chance to stand up and do the right thing by the school superintendent.
Earl's son has a VERY good point. Why is there no limiting mechanism on this poll? That means all of the Telegraph polls are bunk. And the paper publishes it onthe web as popular opinion gospel. Shameful. I will never take another Telegraph poll now that I know it can be rigged by one person with an agenda. Shame on you, Telegraph! There is no integrity in polling this way.
Earl's son has a VERY good point. Why is there no limiting mechanism on this poll? That means all of the Telegraph polls are bunk. And the paper publishes it onthe web as popular opinion gospel. Shameful. I will never take another Telegraph poll now that I know it can be rigged by one person with an agenda. Shame on you, Telegraph! There is no integrity in polling this way.
Seems to me that if his copyright notice says the e-mail may only be published in full, his address should not have been redacted.
Seems to me that if his copyright notice says the e-mail may only be published in full, his address should not have been redacted.
Emails are divided into 2 sections, Headers and Body. I Copyrighted the message body, not the headers.
However, feel free to email me with this address.
Emails are divided into 2 sections, Headers and Body. I Copyrighted the message body, not the headers.
However, feel free to email me with this address.
ryawwn@gmail.com
ryawwn@gmail.com
All I can think of is the old saying "the apple doesn't fall far from the tree".
This looks like a incompetent hacker that got caught. After being caught, the rationalizations and excuses begin. Sound familiar?
All I can think of is the old saying "the apple doesn't fall far from the tree".
This looks like a incompetent hacker that got caught. After being caught, the rationalizations and excuses begin. Sound familiar?