Community Page
- blogs.nashuatelegraph.com/webnotes Jump to website »
-
Subscribe -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Recent Comments
- Thanks for this wonderful post. I learned something new from it
- A few years ago NH Government started taxing us on our campsites. We were already paying the property tax. This tax we pay on our leased campsites, doesn't give us any town priviliages, no...
- Very good, congratulations article
- Very good, congratulations article
- Very good, congratulations article
Jump to original thread »
Well - apparently if you are into that sort of thing - it is possible to manipulate our reader polls without logging in - despite what I said yesterday.
Please see the comments at the bottom of this post to see how we found it out.
In the meantime - we have pulled today’s poll offlin ... Continue reading »
Please see the comments at the bottom of this post to see how we found it out.
In the meantime - we have pulled today’s poll offlin ... Continue reading »
2 years ago
Mr. Kiesow
I’ve just read your “Web Notes” blog entry of the 12th regarding the polls. I might have a suggestion to alleviate some of the inflated numbers you occasionally see, though not all of them.
But first, a word of confession: Those 18 “votes” recorded from adelphia.net were in all probability mine. I’m a regular, registered non-resident reader of the Telegraph and have been so for some time now. I read every part of the website nearly, including the polls on occasion. Unfortunately, in order to read the polls we must “vote.”
In all likelihood those 18 recorded “votes” related to the situation with Dr. Julia Earl, which I have followed as best I might since the whole matter blew up three months ago. Those 18 “votes” – or rather 17 of them – were cast solely for the purpose of checking “the public pulse” on the issue.
Programming is not my forte` and I’m a bit rusty at web coding, but the remedy I propose is rather simple at least on its face: In posting the polls, you might include an option to “view poll results without voting.” I’ve seen other newspapers use that option in polls and have found it rather convenient, as I am a strong proponent of the “one person, one vote” philosophy.
While it does nothing to address the security issue you’re currently grappling with, it might go at least some distance in reducing inflation of poll results.
With kind regards and a wish to be part of a solution rather than a contributor to an obvious problem, I am
Douglas A. Walters
2 years ago
Mr Walters.
Thank you for the suggestion. It is one that has been requested by staff at the Telegraph as well - as they do not want to vote in the polls (and sway the results) in order to see the results.
I will pass the idea along - but I believe as with the overall security issue - it is something that we can not do in-house, and needs to be addressed by our vendor.
Nonetheless - a good idea.
thanks
Damon