<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Web Notes - Latest Comments in Not as secure as we thought?</title><link>http://webnotes.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://webnotes.disqus.com/not_as_secure_as_we_thought/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2006 11:20:28 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Not as secure as we thought?</title><link>http://blogs.nashuatelegraph.com/webnotes/2006/09/12/not-as-secure-as-we-thought/#comment-2141458</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Mr Walters.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thank you for the suggestion. It is one that has been requested by staff at the Telegraph as well - as they do not want to vote in the polls (and sway the results) in order to see the results.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I will pass the idea along - but I believe as with the overall security issue - it is something that we can not do in-house, and needs to be addressed by our vendor.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Nonetheless - a good idea.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;thanks&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Damon&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Damon Kiesow</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2006 11:20:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Not as secure as we thought?</title><link>http://blogs.nashuatelegraph.com/webnotes/2006/09/12/not-as-secure-as-we-thought/#comment-2141457</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Mr. Kiesow&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I’ve just read your “Web Notes” blog entry of the 12th regarding the polls. I might have a suggestion to alleviate some of the inflated numbers you occasionally see, though not all of them. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But first, a word of confession: Those 18 “votes” recorded from &lt;a href="http://adelphia.net" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="adelphia.net"&gt;adelphia.net&lt;/a&gt; were in all probability mine. I’m a regular, registered non-resident reader of the Telegraph and have been so for some time now. I read every part of the website nearly, including the polls on occasion. Unfortunately, in order to read the polls we must “vote.” &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In all likelihood those 18 recorded “votes” related to the situation with Dr. Julia Earl, which I have followed as best I might since the whole matter blew up three months ago. Those 18 “votes” – or rather 17 of them – were cast solely for the purpose of checking “the public pulse” on the issue. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Programming is not my forte` and I’m a bit rusty at web coding, but the remedy I propose is rather simple at least on its face: In posting the polls, you might include an option to “view poll results without voting.” I’ve seen other newspapers use that option in polls and have found it rather convenient, as I am a strong proponent of the “one person, one vote” philosophy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;While it does nothing to address the security issue you’re currently grappling with, it might go at least some distance in reducing inflation of poll results.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;With kind regards and a wish to be part of a solution rather than a contributor to an obvious problem, I am&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Douglas A. Walters&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Douglas A. Walters</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2006 10:18:28 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>